People v. Nash

267 A.D.2d 334, 699 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Nash. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 A.D.2d 696

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered February 25, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[335]*335Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

We agree with the defendant’s contention that the erroneous denial of his challenge for cause to a prospective juror constitutes reversible error because he had exhausted all of his peremptory challenges before the completion of jury selection (see, CPL 270.20 [2]; People v Torpey, 63 NY2d 361, 365; People v White, 260 AD2d 413; People v Molinari, 252 AD2d 532).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nash, 267 A.D.2d 334, 699 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 334 (People v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Torpey
472 N.E.2d 298 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Molinari
252 A.D.2d 532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. White
260 A.D.2d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)