People v. Nash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nash

48 A.D.2d 908, 372 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10179

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 908 (People v. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nash, 48 A.D.2d 908, 372 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 540.30, arising out of a criminal action, to rescind a prior order of forfeiture of bail, the appeal is (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 10, 1974, which denied the application and (2) as limited by appellant’s brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated November 8, 1974, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order of September 10, 1974 dismissed as academic, without costs. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated November 8, 1974 modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of granting remission of $3,250 of the bail forfeited. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 540.30, arising out of a criminal action, to rescind a prior order of forfeiture of bail, the appeal is (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 10, 1974, which denied the application and (2) as limited by appellant’s brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated November 8, 1974, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order of September 10, 1974 dismissed as academic, without costs. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated November 8, 1974 modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of granting remission of $3,250 of the bail forfeited. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 908, 372 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nash-nyappdiv-1975.