Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Naranjo

People v. Naranjo

225 A.D.2d 392, 640 N.Y.2d 13, 640 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2725
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D.2d 392 (People v. Naranjo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Naranjo, 225 A.D.2d 392, 640 N.Y.2d 13, 640 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Defendant’s "inferential bolstering” claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that any "inferential bolstering” error that may have occurred in this case was rendered harmless by the overwhelming evidence of guilt (People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969).

We find that the sentence was not unduly influenced by the court’s consideration of an uncharged crime (see, People v Migliore, 150 AD2d 169, lv denied 74 NY2d 815), and was otherwise a proper exercise of discretion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Johnson
443 N.E.2d 478 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Migliore
150 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 392, 640 N.Y.2d 13, 640 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-naranjo-nyappdiv-1996.