People v. Namro Holding Corp.
171 N.E.2d 893, 8 N.Y.2d 1131
Opinion
Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Foster; Judges Froessel and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum: The majority of this court has voted to affirm upon the ground that the propriety of the notice of violation may not be collaterally reviewed in this criminal action, and without reaching the question as to whether there was in fact a violation of the fire exit rules. With this we cannot agree.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Namro Holding Corp., 171 N.E.2d 893, 8 N.Y.2d 1131 (N.Y. 1960).
171 N.E.2d 893 (People v. Namro Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. New York Racing Ass'n & Barterama & Barterama, Inc.
135 Misc. 2d 453 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Kaufmann
129 Misc. 2d 1052 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. NYRA & Barterama, Inc.
126 Misc. 2d 783 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1984)
People v. Spa Xanadu, Inc.
94 Misc. 2d 10 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1978)
People v. Cedar Management Corp.
83 Misc. 2d 860 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1975)