People v. Nagy
179 A.D.2d 1091, 580 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2505
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for review his contention that the court did not advise him of his right to allocution at sentencing (see, CPL 380.50; People v Green, 54 NY2d 878, 880; People v Regan, 88 AD2d 664). Defendant’s [1092] sentence is not excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kasler, J. — Attempted Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Nagy, 179 A.D.2d 1091, 580 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
179 A.D.2d 1091 (People v. Nagy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ferguson
299 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)