People v. Nagy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nagy

179 A.D.2d 1091, 580 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2505

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 1091 (People v. Nagy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nagy, 179 A.D.2d 1091, 580 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for review his contention that the court did not advise him of his right to allocution at sentencing (see, CPL 380.50; People v Green, 54 NY2d 878, 880; People v Regan, 88 AD2d 664). Defendant’s [1092]*1092sentence is not excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kasler, J. — Attempted Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for review his contention that the court did not advise him of his right to allocution at sentencing (see, CPL 380.50; People v Green, 54 NY2d 878, 880; People v Regan, 88 AD2d 664). Defendant’s [1092]*1092sentence is not excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kasler, J. — Attempted Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.D.2d 1091, 580 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nagy-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack