People v. Nagle
29 P. 640, 3 Cal. Unrep. 488
This text of 29 P. 640 (People v. Nagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Nagle, 29 P. 640, 3 Cal. Unrep. 488 (Cal. 1892).
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of petit larceny under an information charging grand larceny, and now insists [489]*489the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict. There was some evidence before the jury tending to show the guilt of the defendant, and, under those circumstances, we will not disturb the verdict.
Let the judgment and order be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 P. 640, 3 Cal. Unrep. 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nagle-cal-1892.