People v. Nadile

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Nadile

40 N.E.2d 36, 287 N.Y. 748, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1758

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 15, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 N.E.2d 36 (People v. Nadile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nadile, 40 N.E.2d 36, 287 N.Y. 748, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1758 (N.Y. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Rippey, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial on the ground that errors in the admission of evidence and in the charge are of such a serious nature that in his opinion they affect the substantial rights of the defendant and cannot be disregarded under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Rippey, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment of conviction and to order a new trial on the ground that errors in the admission of evidence and in the charge are of such a serious nature that in his opinion they affect the substantial rights of the defendant and cannot be disregarded under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 N.E.2d 36, 287 N.Y. 748, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nadile-ny-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack