People v. Naclerio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Naclerio

56 A.D.2d 663, 391 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 663 (People v. Naclerio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Naclerio, 56 A.D.2d 663, 391 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 6, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the first and second degrees, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of robbery in the second degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The People correctly concede that on this record the appellant could not have committed the crime of robbery in the first degree without, at the same time, having committed the crime of robbery in the second degree (see People v Williams, 50 AD2d 911; People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847; People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784). We note that the judgment of conviction of the codefendant in this case was affirmed upon this very record (People v [664]*664Poveromo, 49 AD2d 928, mot for lv to app den by Cooke, J., Dec. 3, 1975). Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 6, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the first and second degrees, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of robbery in the second degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The People correctly concede that on this record the appellant could not have committed the crime of robbery in the first degree without, at the same time, having committed the crime of robbery in the second degree (see People v Williams, 50 AD2d 911; People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847; People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784). We note that the judgment of conviction of the codefendant in this case was affirmed upon this very record (People v [664]*664Poveromo, 49 AD2d 928, mot for lv to app den by Cooke, J., Dec. 3, 1975). Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 663, 391 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-naclerio-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack