People v. Myers

305 A.D.2d 429, 758 N.Y.S.2d 516
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered November 27, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant received the effective assistance of trial counsel (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]; People v Myers, 220 AD2d 461 [1995]).

The defendant’s claim that the prosecutor’s comments on summation constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Richardson, 294 AD2d 379 [2002]), and, in any event, is without merit. The prosecutor’s summation did not exceed the bounds of rhetorical comment permitted in closing arguments (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105 [1976]), and consequently, did not constitute reversible error (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396 [1981]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are without merit or do not require reversal, as any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]; People v Benjamin, 268 AD2d 486 [2000]). Ritter, J.P., Friedmann, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Myers, 305 A.D.2d 429, 758 N.Y.S.2d 516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 429 (People v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rogers
17 A.D.3d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Kim
2 A.D.3d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)