People v. Myers

248 A.D.2d 559, 669 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Myers. Read the opinion of the Court — 220 A.D.2d 461

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Mackston, J.), rendered April 17, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Based on the testimony of the officers who testified at the combined Wade ¡Huntley hearing, there was probable cause to arrest the defendant (see, CPL 140.10; People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423). We therefore reject the defendant’s contention [560]*560that any statements made by him subsequent to his being detained by the police should have been suppressed as the product of an unlawful arrest.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

Copertino, J. P., Altman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Myers, 248 A.D.2d 559, 669 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 559 (People v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bigelow
488 N.E.2d 451 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)