People v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Myers

195 A.D.2d 1076, 602 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7912

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 16, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports the conclusion that defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909). Defendant has raised no "categories of * * * claims” that survive his waiver (People v Callahan, supra, at 280; see, People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092). Were we to review the merits of defendant’s appeal, we would conclude that the sentence was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Dávis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports the conclusion that defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909). Defendant has raised no "categories of * * * claims” that survive his waiver (People v Callahan, supra, at 280; see, People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092). Were we to review the merits of defendant’s appeal, we would conclude that the sentence was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Dávis, JJ.

People v. Myers, 195 A.D.2d 1076, 602 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

195 A.D.2d 1076 (People v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related