People v. Murray

302 A.D.2d 296, 754 N.Y.S.2d 543, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1728
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Murray. Read the opinion of the Court — 278 A.D.2d 898

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered October 4, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly admitted, on the issue of intent, testimony indicating that defendant may have previously committed similar acts (see People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 245; People v McNair, 167 AD2d 205, lv denied 77 NY2d 909). Contrary to defendant’s assertion, defendant’s intent was a contested issue. Furthermore, the court’s thorough limiting instructions, which the jury is presumed to have followed (see People v Davis, 58 NY2d 1102, 1104), were sufficient to prevent any prejudice. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Murray, 302 A.D.2d 296, 754 N.Y.S.2d 543, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

302 A.D.2d 296 (People v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Davis
449 N.E.2d 710 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Alvino
519 N.E.2d 808 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. McNair
167 A.D.2d 205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)