People v. Murphy-Smolka (Maureen)
This text of People v. Murphy-Smolka (Maureen) (People v. Murphy-Smolka (Maureen)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Maureen Murphy-Smolka, Appellant.
Sussman & Associates (Michael H. Sussman of counsel), for appellant. Orange County District Attorney (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Wawayanda, Orange County (Timothy P. McElduff, Jr., J.), rendered June 7, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of disorderly conduct, and imposed sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Defendant was charged in an accusatory instrument with disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20 [5]). Following a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted as charged.
For the reasons stated in People v Cromwell (___ Misc 3d ____, 2019 NY Slip Op ____ [appeal No. 2017-1310 OR CR], decided herewith), the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
ADAMS, P.J., RUDERMAN and EMERSON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 13, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Murphy-Smolka (Maureen), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-murphy-smolka-maureen-nyappterm-2019.