People v. Murphy

150 A.D.2d 808, 543 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Murphy. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 A.D.2d 177

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered November 3, 1986, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that she had violated a condition thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of grand larceny in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Murphy, 150 A.D.2d 808, 543 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

150 A.D.2d 808 (People v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)