People v. Murphy
This text of 256 A.D. 995 (People v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction of the crimes of attempted rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree. Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county unanimously affirmed. The sentence for attempted rape in the first degree is reversed on the law and annulled. The sentence for assault in the second degree is approved and affirmed. Our disposition is governed by the same reasoning set forth in the accompanying appeal. (People v. Goggin, ante, p. 995.) A sentence of from two and one-half to five years was imposed for assault in the second degree and sentence was suspended for attempted rape in the first degree. While settled practice dictates the sentencing of a defendant under the highest count (People v. Edwards, 173 App. Div. 375; People ex rel. Thornwell v. Heacox, 231 id. 617), error was not committed by imposing a term of imprisonment under the second count. (Penal Law, § 1938.) The defendant cannot, however, be sentenced under both counts. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 995, 10 N.Y.S.2d 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1939.