People v. Murden

131 A.D.2d 704, 516 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48162
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 A.D.2d 704 (People v. Murden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Murden, 131 A.D.2d 704, 516 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gold[705]*705man, J.), rendered April 25, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom (see, People v Giuliano, 65 NY2d 766, 768), it was demonstrated that the defendant’s actions " 'forged a link in the chain of causes which actually brought about the death’ ” of the decedent (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270, 280, quoting from People v Stewart, 40 NY2d 692, 697). Further, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was no evidence adduced at trial that the decedent’s death was caused by the gross negligence of the hospital where she was admitted or by its employees (see, Matter of Anthony M., supra, at 280; People v Bonilla, 63 NY2d 341, 359; People v Murphy, 122 AD2d 893, 894, lv denied 68 NY2d 1003).

The defendant’s contentions of error in the trial court’s charge were unpreserved for review and, in any event, lack merit. The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85-86). Lawrence, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murden v. Artuz
253 F. Supp. 2d 376 (E.D. New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A.D.2d 704, 516 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-murden-nyappdiv-1987.