People v. Munoz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Munoz

120 A.D.2d 750, 502 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 750 (People v. Munoz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Munoz, 120 A.D.2d 750, 502 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from six judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), all rendered September 5, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (four counts), under indictment Nos. 3343/83, 3577/83, 3600/83 and 3601/83 (one count under each indictment), and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), under indictment Nos. 3482/83 and 3528/83 (one count under each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Weinstein, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from six judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), all rendered September 5, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (four counts), under indictment Nos. 3343/83, 3577/83, 3600/83 and 3601/83 (one count under each indictment), and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), under indictment Nos. 3482/83 and 3528/83 (one count under each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Weinstein, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 750, 502 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-munoz-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack