People v. Muniz
Opinion
| People v Muniz |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 05824 |
| Decided on October 26, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: October 26, 2021
Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Singh, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.
Ind. No. 5337/16 Appeal No. 14475 Case No. 2020-04818
v
Carlos Muniz, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Elizabeth T. Schmidt of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen N. Biben, J.), rendered March 04, 2019,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 26, 2021
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2021 NY Slip Op 05824 (People v. Muniz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.