People v. Muniz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Muniz

300 A.D.2d 379, 750 N.Y.S.2d 789, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11940

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), dated September 8, 2000, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s designation of him as a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), dated September 8, 2000, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s designation of him as a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

People v. Muniz, 300 A.D.2d 379, 750 N.Y.S.2d 789, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

300 A.D.2d 379 (People v. Muniz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related