People v. Muniz

248 A.D.2d 644, 669 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2941
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 1998·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered November 15, 1994, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial by the introduction of evidence regarding uncharged crimes. The evidence was admis[645]*645sible to complete the narrative of events and to show the defendant’s motive and intent (see, People v Bowden, 157 AD2d 789; People v Hardwick, 140 AD2d 624; People v Maggio, 137 AD2d 623). The probative value of the evidence clearly outweighed any prejudicial effect and the court gave a proper limiting instruction to the jury (see, People v Bowden, supra; People v Maggio, supra).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People v Gaines, 158 AD2d 540).

Copertino, J. P., Altman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Muniz, 248 A.D.2d 644, 669 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 644 (People v. Muniz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rios
96 A.D.3d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Holden
82 A.D.3d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Fuschino
278 A.D.2d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Shiffer
256 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)