People v. Munford

2017 NY Slip Op 5512, 152 A.D.3d 415, 54 N.Y.S.3d 856
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 6, 2017·No. 8116/98 4416 4415·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about November 24, 2015, which granted defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate an April 13, 1999 judgment of conviction, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion denied, and the conviction reinstated. Appeal from order, same court (Neil E. Ross, J.), entered on or about April 12, 2016, which, upon reargument, adhered to the November 24, 2015 determination, unanimously dismissed, as academic.

The court granted the motion on the ground that the automatic vacatur rule of People v Catu (4 NY3d 242 [2005]) applies retroactively. The Court of Appeals has subsequently rejected that proposition (People v Smith, 28 NY3d 191 [2016]).

*416 Any allegations of prejudice raised by defendant in his pro se submission to the motion court were insufficient to warrant a hearing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Maz-zarelli and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Munford, 2017 NY Slip Op 5512, 152 A.D.3d 415, 54 N.Y.S.3d 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5512 (People v. Munford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Catu
825 N.E.2d 1081 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
The People v. Roni Smith The People v. Keith Fagan
66 N.E.3d 641 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)