People v. Mumford

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Mumford

188 N.W.2d 651, 32 Mich. App. 364, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1911

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 2, 1971

DocketDocket No. 10306

StatusPublished

This text of 188 N.W.2d 651 (People v. Mumford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mumford, 188 N.W.2d 651, 32 Mich. App. 364, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1911 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals as of right from a plea-based conviction of assault with intent to rob while armed. He was originally charged with armed robbery and pleaded guilty to the lesser offense. The people move to affirm.

Defendant’s only claim of error is that his conviction was invalid because the trial judge failed to advise him as to the elements of the crime to which he pleaded guilty. No such advice is necessary. People v. Harvey (1970), 24 Mich App 363.

The trial judge fully complied with all of the requirements of GrCR 1963, 785.3(2). Defendant was adequately advised of his rights and interrogation of the defendant by the trial judge as to the facts of the crime indicated clearly that the defendant was guilty of both the crime to which he pleaded guilty and the crime with which he was originally charged.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI