People v. Mulligan

2024 NY Slip Op 03968
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 26, 2024
Docket443 KA 20-01659
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 03968 (People v. Mulligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mulligan, 2024 NY Slip Op 03968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Mulligan (2024 NY Slip Op 03968)
People v Mulligan
2024 NY Slip Op 03968
Decided on July 26, 2024
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 26, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, DELCONTE, KEANE, AND HANNAH, JJ.

443 KA 20-01659

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

EDWIN L. MULLIGAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


JULIE CIANCA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (CLEA WEISS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II, OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a resentence of the Monroe County Court (Karen Bailey Turner, J.), rendered October 23, 2020. Defendant was resentenced upon his conviction of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of, inter alia, attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law

§§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]) and assault in the first degree (§ 120.10 [1]) and now appeals from a resentence with respect to that conviction. Contrary to defendant's contention, we conclude that the resentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: July 26, 2024

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 110.00
New York PEN § 110.00

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 03968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mulligan-nyappdiv-2024.