People v. Muller

226 A.D. 773
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, reversed upon the law and the facts, and new trial ordered. Defendant testified that he was ill and unconscious at the time the train that he was operating passed the danger signal. If so, there could not be a willful violation of his duty not to pass the signal. The trial court should have taken this into account as the determining feature in deciding whether there was a violation of the statute in question (Penal Law, § 1984, subd. 2). Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Muller, 226 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

226 A.D. 773 (People v. Muller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cummings
29 Misc. 2d 545 (New York County Courts, 1961)