Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Mullens, Solomon

People v. Mullens, Solomon

81 N.E.2d 332, 298 N.Y. 606
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 16, 1948·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*608 Oedee of Appellate Division, insofar as it reverses that part of the order of the Conrt of General Sessions dismissing counts one and four of the indictment and denies defendants’ motion to dismiss said counts, reversed, and the order of the Court of General Sessions affirmed, and except as so modified order of Appellate Division affirmed. We do not find in the grand jury-minutes independent, nonaccomplice evidence sufficient in law (Code Crim. Pro., § 399) to corroborate the testimony given by the accomplice Walsey concerning the so-called 1935 transaction, and legally adequate to support counts 1 and 4. (People v. Mullens and Solomon, 292 N. Y. 408, 414-417; People v. Nitzberg, 289 N. Y. 523, 526, 530-531). No opinion.

Concur: Lottghran, Ch. J., Lewis, DesmoNd, Thacher and Dye, JJ. Taking no part: CoNway and Ftjld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mullens, Solomon, 81 N.E.2d 332, 298 N.Y. 606 (N.Y. 1948).

81 N.E.2d 332 (People v. Mullens, Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Canzio v. Kennedy
67 A.D.2d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
People v. Rossi
157 N.E.2d 859 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
People v. Caminito
148 N.E.2d 139 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)