People v. Mullens, Solomon
This text of 81 N.E.2d 332 (People v. Mullens, Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*608 Oedee of Appellate Division, insofar as it reverses that part of the order of the Conrt of General Sessions dismissing counts one and four of the indictment and denies defendants’ motion to dismiss said counts, reversed, and the order of the Court of General Sessions affirmed, and except as so modified order of Appellate Division affirmed. We do not find in the grand jury-minutes independent, nonaccomplice evidence sufficient in law (Code Crim. Pro., § 399) to corroborate the testimony given by the accomplice Walsey concerning the so-called 1935 transaction, and legally adequate to support counts 1 and 4. (People v. Mullens and Solomon, 292 N. Y. 408, 414-417; People v. Nitzberg, 289 N. Y. 523, 526, 530-531). No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 N.E.2d 332, 298 N.Y. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mullens-solomon-ny-1948.