People v. Mulkey
Opinion
The defendant was charged by information with the crime of feloniously entering a certain dwelling-house with intent to commit larceny. The court below instructed the jury that if they believed from the evidence that the defendant entered the house with the intent to commit grand or petit larceny or any felony, they should find him guilty.
This instruction Was clearly erroneous. There is nothing better settled than that the crime charged must be proved before a conviction can be had.
Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
McKinstry, J., and McKee, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
4 P. 507 (People v. Mulkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.