Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Mujahid

People v. Mujahid

142 A.D.3d 1185, 37 N.Y.S.3d 905
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 2016
Docket2015-08704
StatusPublished

This text of 142 A.D.3d 1185 (People v. Mujahid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mujahid, 142 A.D.3d 1185, 37 N.Y.S.3d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal by the *1186 defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sciarrino, J.), imposed August 18, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341 [2015]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; cf. People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145-146 [2014]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 A.D.3d 1185, 37 N.Y.S.3d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mujahid-nyappdiv-2016.