People v. Muhammad
This text of 231 A.D.2d 453 (People v. Muhammad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered March 16, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 31/2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his appellate claims that the hearing court improperly interfered with his questioning of the witnesses during the Mapp hearing, depriving him of due process, and abused its discretion at the Sandoval hearing by ruling defendant’s prior conviction for robbery in the second degree admissible (see, People v Robles, 160 AD2d 252, lv denied 76 NY2d 795; People v Otero, 184 AD2d 484, lv denied [454]*45480 NY2d 976). In any event, the claims are without merit. Concur—Rubin, J. P., Ross, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D.2d 453, 647 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-muhammad-nyappdiv-1996.