People v. Moye

275 A.D.2d 887, 714 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9655
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10 [1]), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (two counts) (Penal Law § 165.45) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25). He contends that the proof of guilt is legally insufficient in several [888] respects. Because he made only a general motion to dismiss based on legally insufficient evidence, his contention is not preserved for our review (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19; People v Shannon, 269 AD2d 839; People v Schultz, 266 AD2d 919, lv denied 94 NY2d 906) and, in any event, lacks merit. The evidence is legally sufficient to establish defendant’s involvement as an accomplice (see, Penal Law § 20.00) in a scheme to steal property with a stolen credit card. We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.— Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Moye, 275 A.D.2d 887, 714 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 887 (People v. Moye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Quaresimo
286 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)