People v. Moyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moyd

193 A.D.2d 763, 598 N.Y.S.2d 984

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 763 (People v. Moyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Moyd, 193 A.D.2d 763, 598 N.Y.S.2d 984 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered April 3, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions regarding the adequacy of his plea allocution have not been preserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise these claims in seeking to withdraw his guilty plea in the court of first instance (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Berrios, 144 AD2d 566). In any event, the factual admissions made by the defendant during his plea allocution were sufficient to establish the elements of the crime to which he pleaded guilty (see, Penal Law § 160.15 [3]). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered April 3, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions regarding the adequacy of his plea allocution have not been preserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise these claims in seeking to withdraw his guilty plea in the court of first instance (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Berrios, 144 AD2d 566). In any event, the factual admissions made by the defendant during his plea allocution were sufficient to establish the elements of the crime to which he pleaded guilty (see, Penal Law § 160.15 [3]). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 763, 598 N.Y.S.2d 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moyd-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack