People v. Mota

3 A.D.3d 348, 769 N.Y.S.2d 893

This text of 3 A.D.3d 348 (People v. Mota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mota, 3 A.D.3d 348, 769 N.Y.S.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), rendered July 7, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his argument that the court should not have imposed sentence without having received a report of the psychiatric, psychological and intelligence testing it had ordered in aid of sentencing, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant was not prejudiced because he received the minimum lawful sentence and because nothing in the record casts any doubt on his mental competence. Defendant’s plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 [1983]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.D.3d 348, 769 N.Y.S.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mota-nyappdiv-2004.