People v. Mota

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mota

125 A.D.2d 609, 509 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 125 A.D.2d 609 (People v. Mota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mota, 125 A.D.2d 609, 509 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Curci, J.), both rendered May 31, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (two counts; one count as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The record discloses that the defendant was fully advised of the rights he would be waiving by pleading guilty and that he sufficiently admitted the underlying facts of the crimes for which he now stands convicted. Contrary to the defendant’s assertions, his belated and unsubstantiated claim of innocence does not render the plea proceedings defective and the judgments of conviction are, accordingly, affirmed (see, People v Morris, 118 AD2d 595; People v Stubbs, 110 AD2d 725). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Curci, J.), both rendered May 31, 1984, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (two counts; one count as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The record discloses that the defendant was fully advised of the rights he would be waiving by pleading guilty and that he sufficiently admitted the underlying facts of the crimes for which he now stands convicted. Contrary to the defendant’s assertions, his belated and unsubstantiated claim of innocence does not render the plea proceedings defective and the judgments of conviction are, accordingly, affirmed (see, People v Morris, 118 AD2d 595; People v Stubbs, 110 AD2d 725). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 A.D.2d 609, 509 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mota-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack