People v. Mosqueda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mosqueda

198 A.D.2d 308, 604 N.Y.S.2d 809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 308 (People v. Mosqueda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mosqueda, 198 A.D.2d 308, 604 N.Y.S.2d 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), entered February 21, 1992, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior determination, made in an order of the same court, entered December 19, 1991, denying his motion pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered September 21, 1988, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment (see, CPL 440.10 [2] [c]). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), entered February 21, 1992, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior determination, made in an order of the same court, entered December 19, 1991, denying his motion pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered September 21, 1988, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment (see, CPL 440.10 [2] [c]). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 308, 604 N.Y.S.2d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mosqueda-nyappdiv-1993.