People v. Mosley
This text of 87 A.D.3d 1179 (People v. Mosley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In satisfaction of three separate indictments charging him with a number of crimes, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, driving while intoxicated and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. Consistent with the plea agreement, he was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of six years on the criminal sale conviction, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision, lVa to 4 years on the driving while intoxicated conviction, and 21/2 years on the criminal possession conviction, to be followed by two years of post-release supervision. Defendant appeals.
Defendant contends that the sentence is harsh and excessive. Based upon our review of the record, we disagree. Defendant has a lengthy criminal record characterized by numerous drug and alcohol-related offenses. In view of this, and given that the agreed-upon sentence exposed defendant to significantly less prison time than he could have faced if convicted after trial, we find no extraordinary circumstances nor any abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Williams, 76 AD3d 1141, 1142 [2010]; People v McPherson, 76 AD3d 1117 [2010]).
Mercure, J.P., Peters, Lahtinen, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 A.D.3d 1179, 929 N.Y.2d 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mosley-nyappdiv-2011.