People v. Mosley

53 A.D.2d 523, 384 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13120
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mosley. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 A.D.2d 891

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered November 30, 1973, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentences for robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and possession of a weapon, and otherwise affirmed. As the District Attorney concedes, defendant’s conviction and sentence on the charge of robbery in the first degree necessarily requires a vacation of the other inclusory concurrent sentences. (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847; People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mosley, 53 A.D.2d 523, 384 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

53 A.D.2d 523 (People v. Mosley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Grier
340 N.E.2d 471 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Pyles
44 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)