People v. Mosley

California Court of Appeal

People v. Mosley

48 Cal. App. 399

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 1, 1920

DocketCrim. No. 505

StatusPublished

This text of 48 Cal. App. 399 (People v. Mosley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mosley, 48 Cal. App. 399 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted in the superior court of the county of San Joaquin of the crime of grand [400]*400larceny in having stolen two head of cattle, the property oi one Chris Wencelburger. [1]- No appearance has been made for appellant in this court and our attention has not. been called to any reason why the judgment should he reversed. We have, however, examined the record and find abundant evidence of the guilt of defendant and are satisfied that no prejudicial error was committed and that defendant had a fair and impartial trial.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted in the superior court of the county of San Joaquin of the crime of grand [400]*400larceny in having stolen two head of cattle, the property oi one Chris Wencelburger. [1]- No appearance has been made for appellant in this court and our attention has not. been called to any reason why the judgment should he reversed. We have, however, examined the record and find abundant evidence of the guilt of defendant and are satisfied that no prejudicial error was committed and that defendant had a fair and impartial trial.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 Cal. App. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mosley-calctapp-1920.