People v. Moskowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moskowitz

89 A.D.2d 572, 452 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17630

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.2d 572 (People v. Moskowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Moskowitz, 89 A.D.2d 572, 452 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), imposed January 29, 1982, the sentence being a prison term of one year. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a period of probation of five years and imprisonment for 60 days, said term of imprisonment shall be a condition of and run concurrently with the period of probation. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Orange County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to GPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Gulotta and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), imposed January 29, 1982, the sentence being a prison term of one year. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a period of probation of five years and imprisonment for 60 days, said term of imprisonment shall be a condition of and run concurrently with the period of probation. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Orange County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to GPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Gulotta and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 572, 452 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moskowitz-nyappdiv-1982.