People v. Moshell
38 N.E.2d 108, 287 N.Y. 9, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1403
Opinion
On this record it was proper to admit the testimony of the defendant’s daughter at the trial in Philadelphia upon the question of his motive, intent and state of mind. The testimony of the other witnesses on that trial was not admissible, but in this instance was helpful rather than haimful to the defendant.
The judgment of conviction should be affirmed.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.
Judgment of conviction affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Moshell, 38 N.E.2d 108, 287 N.Y. 9, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1403 (N.Y. 1941).
38 N.E.2d 108 (People v. Moshell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Prince
106 A.D.2d 521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Newsome
52 Misc. 2d 178 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)