People v. Morton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Morton

94 A.D.3d 574, 944 N.Y.S.2d 712

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Morton. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 A.D.3d 1507 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 2012·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of resentence of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), rendered on or about June 23, 2010, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Tom, J.E, Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of resentence of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), rendered on or about June 23, 2010, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Tom, J.E, Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

People v. Morton, 94 A.D.3d 574, 944 N.Y.S.2d 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

94 A.D.3d 574 (People v. Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.