People v. Morrone

210 A.D.3d 1009, 176 N.Y.S.3d 919, 2022 NY Slip Op 06718
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 2022·No. 2020-03092·Published

Opinion

People v Morrone (2022 NY Slip Op 06718)
People v Morrone
2022 NY Slip Op 06718
Decided on November 23, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 23, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
WILLIAM G. FORD
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2020-03092
2020-03094

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Oona Morrone, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 1553/19, 1554/19)


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and William H. Branigan of counsel; Gianna Gambino on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Michelle Johnson, J., at pleas; Bruna L. DiBiase, J., at sentences), both rendered February 5, 2020, convicting her of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 1553/19, and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 1554/19, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, FORD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Morrone, 210 A.D.3d 1009, 176 N.Y.S.3d 919, 2022 NY Slip Op 06718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

210 A.D.3d 1009 (People v. Morrone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)