People v. Morrison

2020 NY Slip Op 706, 179 A.D.3d 1454, 114 N.Y.S.3d 917
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2020
Docket67 KA 17-00729
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 706 (People v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Morrison, 2020 NY Slip Op 706, 179 A.D.3d 1454, 114 N.Y.S.3d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Morrison (2020 NY Slip Op 00706)
People v Morrison
2020 NY Slip Op 00706
Decided on January 31, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 31, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

67 KA 17-00729

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

KEITH O. MORRISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAMES B. RITTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA, FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered January 18, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.16 [1]). Contrary to his contention and the People's incorrect concession (see People v Berrios, 28 NY2d 361, 366-367 [1971]; People v Adair, 177 AD3d 1357, 1357 [4th Dept 2019]), the record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Hoke, 167 AD3d 1549, 1549-1550 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 33 NY3d 949 [2019]; People v Robinson, 112 AD3d 1349, 1349 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 1042 [2014]). The valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses defendant's challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).

Entered: January 31, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Durie
188 N.Y.S.3d 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Shantz
2020 NY Slip Op 4680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 706, 179 A.D.3d 1454, 114 N.Y.S.3d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-morrison-nyappdiv-2020.