People v. Morris
57 A.D.3d 573, 867 N.Y.2d 698
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant contends that certain comments made by the prosecutor constituted reversible error. To the extent that the prosecutor made improper remarks during summation, the error was harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, [574]*57490 AD2d 80, 86 [1982]). Skelos, J.E, Lifson, Santucci and Garni, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Morris, 57 A.D.3d 573, 867 N.Y.2d 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 573 (People v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gross
78 A.D.3d 1196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)