People v. Morris

273 A.D.2d 412, 711 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7020

This text of 273 A.D.2d 412 (People v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Morris, 273 A.D.2d 412, 711 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Appeal by the [413]*413defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wade, J.), rendered July 15, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the prosecutor’s facially-neutral explanations for excusing black female jurors were not pretextual (see, People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101).

The defendant’s remaining contention does not require reversal. O’Brien, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Allen
653 N.E.2d 1173 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D.2d 412, 711 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-morris-nyappdiv-2000.