People v. Morris

248 A.D.2d 644, 669 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2837
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Morris. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 A.D.2d 451

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered July 5, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, People v Schwartzman, 24 NY2d 241, 244, cert denied 396 US 846; People v Heung K. Sul, 234 AD2d 563; People v Schinas, 204 AD2d 362; see also, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Morris, 248 A.D.2d 644, 669 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 644 (People v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Schwartzman
247 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Schinas
204 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Heung K. Sul
234 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)