Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Moriah

People v. Moriah

61 A.D.3d 945, 876 N.Y.S.2d 898
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 28, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.3d 945 (People v. Moriah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Moriah, 61 A.D.3d 945, 876 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J), dated September 28, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

[946]*946Ordered that the order is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A.D.3d 945, 876 N.Y.S.2d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moriah-nyappdiv-2009.