People v. Moriah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moriah

61 A.D.3d 945, 876 N.Y.S.2d 898

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Moriah. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 A.D.3d 534 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 2009·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J), dated September 28, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

[946]*946Ordered that the order is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J), dated September 28, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

[946]*946Ordered that the order is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

People v. Moriah, 61 A.D.3d 945, 876 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

61 A.D.3d 945 (People v. Moriah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related