People v. Moreira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moreira

8 A.D.3d 97, 777 N.Y.S.2d 907

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 97 (People v. Moreira) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Moreira, 8 A.D.3d 97, 777 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered October 15, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 years, 10 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty pleas, after according defendant a sufficient opportunity to present his contentions (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The record establishes that defendant’s pleas were knowing, intelligent and voluntary and were entered with the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered October 15, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 years, 10 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty pleas, after according defendant a sufficient opportunity to present his contentions (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The record establishes that defendant’s pleas were knowing, intelligent and voluntary and were entered with the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 97, 777 N.Y.S.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moreira-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack