People v. Morales

216 A.D.2d 93, 627 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6359
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Morales. Read the opinion of the Court — 189 A.D.2d 700

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered March 30, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor’s summation deprived him of a fair trial by improperly commenting on his decision not to testify or present a defense, and by vouching for and bolstering the testimony of the People’s witnesses, is largely unpreserved, and in any event without merit. The challenged comments did not shift the burden of proof and were a fair response to a defense summation that implied that the police deliberately arrested an innocent man to satisfy neighborhood complaints (see, People v Carraquillo, 202 AD2d 253, 254, lv denied 84 NY2d 823). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Morales, 216 A.D.2d 93, 627 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 93 (People v. Morales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Carraquillo
202 A.D.2d 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)