People v. Morales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Morales

92 A.D.2d 575, 459 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.2d 575 (People v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Morales, 92 A.D.2d 575, 459 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), imposed June 4,1982, upon his conviction of attempted unlawful Grand Jury disclosure, upon a plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of one year and a $500 fine. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a three-year period of probation and a $500 fine. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), imposed June 4,1982, upon his conviction of attempted unlawful Grand Jury disclosure, upon a plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of one year and a $500 fine. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a three-year period of probation and a $500 fine. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 575, 459 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-morales-nyappdiv-1983.