People v. Mora & Rangel

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mora & Rangel. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 92
California Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 2018·No. S079925M·Published

Opinion

Filed 8/22/18

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S079925 v. ) ) JOSEPH ADAM MORA and RUBEN ) RANGEL, ) ) Los Angeles County Defendants and Appellants. ) Super. Ct. No. TA037999 ____________________________________)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

THE COURT: The opinion in this matter filed July 2, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 442, is modified as follows: 1. The second to last sentence in the second full paragraph on page 489 beginning with the words, “The wallets were,” is modified to read as follows: “Urrutia’s wallet was found in an open and apparent location in the 4Runner.” 2. The second to last sentence in the second full paragraph on page 491 beginning with the words, “Defendants allowed,” is modified to read as follows: “Defendants allowed Urrutia time to remove his wallet and place it in an open area of the 4Runner before finally shooting him, while Encinas’s wallet remained in the vehicle’s center console.” This modification does not affect the judgment. The petitions for rehearing are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mora & Rangel, (Cal. 2018).

People v. Mora & Rangel (People v. Mora & Rangel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mora & Rangel
420 P.3d 902 (California Supreme Court, 2018)