People v. Moorer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moorer

20 A.D.2d 730, 249 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4340

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 730 (People v. Moorer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Moorer, 20 A.D.2d 730, 249 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered June 25, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and sentencing him to serve a term of 5 to 15 years. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted. Unfortunately, the transcript of the stenographic minutes as presented to us is, in several portions, so confusing and unintelligible that it is impossible for us to determine the propriety of the charge to the jury or the merits of the points urged by the appellant and the respondent. Under the circumstances a new trial is required in the interests of justice. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered June 25, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and sentencing him to serve a term of 5 to 15 years. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted. Unfortunately, the transcript of the stenographic minutes as presented to us is, in several portions, so confusing and unintelligible that it is impossible for us to determine the propriety of the charge to the jury or the merits of the points urged by the appellant and the respondent. Under the circumstances a new trial is required in the interests of justice. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 730, 249 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moorer-nyappdiv-1964.